Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
ATHULNATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. discussion on allegations and settlement between the parties. (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. counsel's argument on the settlement and false allegations. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's assessment of the situation based on the settlement. (Para 7) |
| 4. bail granted with conditions. (Para 8) |
O R D E R
This bail application is filed under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short ‘ BNSS ’). 2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.663 of 2025 of Adoor Police Station, Pathanamthitta, which has been transferred to and now pending as Crime No.779 of 2025 of Anchalummood Police Station registered for the offence punishable under section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’).
3. According to the prosecution, the accused had, under a false promise of marriage, indulged in sexual intercourse with the de facto complainant and thereby committed the offences alleged.
4. I have heard Sri.K.R.Sunil., the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Smt.Sreeja V., the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the entire prosecution allegations are false, and the incident as alleged had not occurred. It was also
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
