Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
Y.C. STEAPHEN, ANNIES STEAPHEN, SUDEEP RAJAN, RAJENDRAN M.B. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioners are trustees alleged to have failed in their obligation to return deposits. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. the significance of the allegations against the petitioners has been noted. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. the court's discretion in granting bail was informed by the standards set in prior rulings. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. the court issued a ruling allowing bail under specified conditions. (Para 11) |
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
……………………………………………………...…..
B.A. Nos. 5584 of 2025, 5585 of 2025, 5588 of 2025, 5591 of 2025 & 5650 of 2025 ……………………………………………………….….
Dated this the 29th day of July, 2025
COMMON ORDER
These bail applications are filed under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘ BNSS ’).
2. Petitioners in all these bail applications are the accused in various crimes before the Kumily Police Station. Petitioners in B.A. No. 5584 of 2025 is the accused in Crime No. 281/2025, petitioners in B.A. No. 5585 of 2025 are the accused in Crime No. 283/2025, petitioners in B.A. No. 5588 of 2025 are the accused in Crime No. 284/2025, petitioners in B.A. No. 5591 of 2025 are the accused in Crime No. 282/2025 and petitioners in B.A. No. 5650 of 2025 are the ac
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
