Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, SYAM KUMAR V.M., JJ
M. N. JANARDHANAN NAMBIAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. timely resolution of complaints is essential, especially for senior citizens. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. the appellant's complaint has been pending since 2015, causing hardship. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments presented regarding the adequacy of relief granted by the single judge. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. the court upheld the single judge's directive for timely disposal of the case. (Para 8) |
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
Heard finally with the consent of both sides. The present intra-
court appeal under Section 5 of the Kerala High Court Act , 1958 assails the judgment dated 10.12.2024 passed in WP(C) No.42530/2024 whereby the learned Single Judge has disposed the Writ Petition filed by the appellant.
2. The appellant/petitioner had filed the Writ Petition praying for the following reliefs:
“I. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, compelling the 2nd Respondent to prioritize and expedite the pending proceedings in OP No. 349/2015, II. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, compelling the 2nd Respondent to conduct regular hearings, ensuring regular progress in the case, III. Issue a writ in th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
