IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. NATARAJAN, J
REJI K. VARGHESE – Appellant
Versus
SMT.SUSAN RUBAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner sought restoration of execution due to administrative failure. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court emphasized the need for timely handling of cases by the subordinate court. (Para 5 , 6) |
The Original petition is filed by the petitioner/decree holder for issuing direction to the Sub Court, Kattapana, to hear and dispose the Exhibit-P3 in E.P.No.7/2015.
2. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent.
3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is a decree holder obtaining the preliminary decree for realization of money before the Addl. Sub Court, Thiruvananthapuram, in O.S.No. 200/2009 dated 13.11.2013. Subsequently, the petitioner found the defendant having property within the Jurisdiction of the Sub Court, Kattapana. Therefore, he got the transfer decree and filed it before the Sub Court, Kattapana, in E.P.No.7/2015. During the pendency of the said execution petition, a new Sub Court has been established at Devikulam, and it is further contended that after the establishment of the new Sub Court at Devikulam, the trial court ought to have transferred the said execution petition to the Sub Court, D
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.