Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
SATHYAN.K.K – Appellant
Versus
ROHINI LEASE AND GENERAL FINANCIERS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction based on dishonoured cheque (Para 3) |
| 2. judicial process and appeals (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. accused's defense and credibility (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. presumptions under ni act (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. final decision and dismissal (Para 12) |
P.V. BALAKRISHNAN, J. …................................... Crl.R.P.No.1211 of 2017 …......................................................... Dated this the 1st day of August, 2025 ORDER Under challenge in this revision petition is the conviction and sentence rendered against the revision petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as 'NI Act' for short).
2. The revision petitioner is the accused in CC No.2146 of
2015 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court (NI Act cases), Kozhikode.
3. The case of the complainant is that the accused issued Ext.P5 cheque dated 13.08.2014 for Rs.81,000/- drawn on his account with the Federal Bank, Kuttiady branch, towards the repayment of the loan availed by him from the complainant. When the complainant presented the cheque for collection, it got dishonoured due to the reason that 'drawers signature differs'. Even though, the complainant issu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
