Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Devan Ramachandran, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
VAISHRAVI – Appellant
Versus
AKII. VISENU, SHELliY BABU – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. wife challenges family court's denial of divorce. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. settlement through mediation confirmed by the court. (Para 3 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. marriage deemed irretrievably broken, enabling divorce. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. divorce granted by mutual consent per section 13b. (Para 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT
M.B.Snehalatha, J
Challenge in this appeal is by the wife against the judgment and decree of the Family Court, Pala which declined the relief of divorce sought by her under Section 13 (1)(i)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act , 1955.
2. Today, when this appeal came up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for both sides submitted that the entire disputes between the parties have been settled in the mediation held under the aegis of Mediation Centre, Ernakulam and a memorandum of agreement has been filed before this Court.
3. We have examined the memorandum of agreement and we notice that it has been signed by the parties and subscribed by their counsel. The terms of the agreement are lawful and therefore, the settlement arrived at by the parties is accepted.
4. In view of the settlement arrived at by the parties, appellant and respondent have filed a petition under Section 13B of the H
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
