Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N. Nagaresh, J
ISMAIL M. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of illicit relationship and their implications. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. definitions and implications under the pocso act. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. application of definitions concerning actions observed in presence of a minor. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. judicial observations on special court's authority to take cognizance. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
O R D E R
The prayers in the aforecaptioned Criminal Revision Petitioner Case filed under Secs. 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , are as follows:
“i. Set aside the order in C.M.P.No.1198/2018 dated 10/01/2019 on the files of the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Kollam, (sic) allow the same;
ii. Grant such other relief deemed fit and proper by this Honourable Court.”
2. Heard Sri.Vinay Ramdas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner (complainant), Sri.Saigi Jacob Palatty, learned Prosecutor appearing for R-1 State, Sri.K.V.Anil Kumar, learned counsel appearing for R-2 and Sri.M.R.Sudheendran, learned counsel appearing for R 3. Though notice process on R-4 has been duly completed, there is no appearance for that party.
3. The gist of the allegations in Anx. A-1 complaint is as follows:
The petitioner and the 2nd respo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
