Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. ANU SIVARAMAN, J
JAYACHANDRAN.R – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging the qualifications for a governmental post. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding the appropriateness of qualifications. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations on the validity of the qualifications. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. final ruling on the petition. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:-
A) To declare that Exts.P5 & P9 are arbitrary, unreasonable and unconstitutional.
B) To quash the Ext.P5 & P9 order issued by the respondents by the issuance of a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ, order or direction.
C) Issue a writ of Mandamus or an appropriate writ of such nature directing the respondents to include other branches of engineering & MBA as the essential qualification for the post of Managing Director of the 5th Respondent Company.
D) In the alternative, issue a writ of Mandamus or an appropriate writ of such nature directing the respondents directing MBA to be prescribed as a general essential qualification for the appointment of Managing Directors in PSUs.
E) To direct the respondents to consider the Exts.P1 to P4 representation filed by the petitioner forthwith.
2. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
