Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
SATISH S. NAIR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. issuance of building permit in regulated area. (Para 2) |
| 2. noc and proposal submission from competent authority. (Para 4) |
| 3. respondents' counterarguments against construction. (Para 5) |
| 4. awareness of noc requirements for construction. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. comparative analysis of similar cases. (Para 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 18th day of July, 2025 Petitioners have approached this Court challenging Exts.P6 and P8.
2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the writ petition are as follows:-
Petitioners are in possession of 2.03 ares of property in Re.Sy. No.36/6-2-12 of Thiruvallam Village in Thiruvananthapuram District. Petitioners submitted application before the Thiruvananthapuram Corporation for building permit which was granted as per Ext.P1. On the strength of Ext.P1 the residential house was constructed strictly in compliance with the conditions in Ext.P1. While so, petitioners were issued with Ext.P2 notice from the 5th respondent intimating that the residential building is situated in a regulated area of centrally protected monument, Shri.Parasurama Temple at Thiruvallam, and the petitioners have to remove the unauthorised building/construction. Ther
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
