IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
K Narayanan Kutty – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition for mandamus regarding temple funds. (Para 1) |
| 2. functions and scope of the learned ombudsman. (Para 5) |
| 3. clarifications on the complaints before ombudsman. (Para 7 , 8) |
JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioners, who are devotees of Lord Vadakkumnathan of Sree Vadakkumnathan Temple, Thrissur, which is under the management of the 3rd respondent Cochin Devaswom Board, have filed this writ petition, invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India , seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 3rd respondent Board to take immediate steps to account the income and expenditure of ‘Aanayoottu’ conducted in the year 2024 in Vadakkumnathan Temple, including the income generated from putting up advertisement boards, and submit the same before this Court, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court; a writ of mandamus commanding the 1st respondent State to repatriate the 4th respondent, who is holding the post of Devaswom Commissioner, Cochin Devaswom Board, to his parent department; a writ of mandamus commanding the 3rd respondent Board to act upon Ext.P1 complaint dated 04.07.2025 made by the 1st petitioner and E
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.