Back
Next 
2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 45264
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
BABY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL LTD – Appellant
Versus
HARSHIL R. MEENA I.A.S. – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 902 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.45492 OF 2024
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.M.SASINDRAN, SHRI.T.S.BHARATH KRISHNA
For the Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER- SMT.DEEPA V
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.M.SASINDRAN, SHRI.T.S.BHARATH KRISHNA
For the Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER- SMT.DEEPA V
Non-compliance with court directions can lead to contempt proceedings, but compliance can negate such claims.
Headnote:Contempt proceedings initiated for non-compliance with a previous judgment, which the government claimed had been complied with. Following evidence from counsel, the petitioner's right to seek further remedies was preserved. The court closed the contempt case based on the government's compliance evidence.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed alleging non-compliance with court directions. (Para 1) |
| 2. government claims compliance with the directives. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
The contempt case is filed alleging non-
compliance of the directions in Annexure-A1 judgment.
2. The learned Senior Government Pleader submitted that, the directions in Annexure-A1 judgment have already been complied, by rejecting the petitioner’s Form 9 application on 05.06.2025.
Recording the above submission, by reserving the right of the petitioner to work out their remedies, in accordance with law,the Contempt of Court Case is closed.
