IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. G. Ajithkumar, J
AMBALAKKUTH ASHARAF – Appellant
Versus
RUSNA – Respondent
O R D E R
This Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 31.08.2018 in MC No.339/2016 on the file of the Family Court, Malappuram. As per the impugned order, the Family Court granted maintenance to the respondent wife at the rate of Rs.5,000/-. Aggrieved by the same, this revision petition is filed.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the counsel for the respondent.
3. The Family Court found that there is continuous ill-treatment from the side of the petitioner and therefore the respondent is living separately. The Family Court considered the harassment made by the petitioner in detail in the impugned order. This Court, using the revisional jurisdiction, cannot interfere with such a fact finding by the Family Court. As far as the quantum of maintenance is concerned, the Family Court considered that, as evident by Exts.A2 to A7, the petitioner has got properties. The petitioner was admittedly in Jeddha for nine years. It is also found that the petitioner has got partnership business in a lorry and sawmill. In such circumstances, the Family Court fixed the maintenance @ Rs.5,000/-. I see absolutely no reason to interfere with the same.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.