Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
AMBALAKKUTH ASHARAF – Appellant
Versus
RUSNA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case regarding maintenance appeal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discussion around the grounds of appeal regarding maintenance amount. (Para 3) |
| 3. judicial emphasis on protective laws for women and dignified living. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's final judgement on the maintenance claim. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
This Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 31.08.2018 in MC No.339/2016 on the file of the Family Court, Malappuram. As per the impugned order, the Family Court granted maintenance to the respondent wife at the rate of Rs.5,000/-. Aggrieved by the same, this revision petition is filed.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the counsel for the respondent.
3. The Family Court found that there is continuous ill-treatment from the side of the petitioner and therefore the respondent is living separately. The Family Court considered the harassment made by the petitioner in detail in the impugned order. This Court, using the revisional jurisdiction, cannot interfere with such a fact finding by the Family Court. As far as the quantum of maintenance is concerned, the Family Court considered that, as evident by Exts.A2 to A7, the petitione
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
