MUHAMMED JASIL P, MUHAMMED SINAN M, MUHSIN V, VISHNU C., SHIBIN SHAD K, MUNEEB P vs STATE OF KERALA

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 45576

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V. G. Arun, J
MUHAMMED JASIL P, MUHAMMED SINAN M, MUHSIN V, VISHNU C., SHIBIN SHAD K, MUNEEB P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.RAHMATHULLAH.M
For the Respondents: SRI. AJITH MURALI, SHRI.MUHAMED ASLAM

Table of Content
1. dispute settled amicably. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. no public interest in continuing proceedings. (Para 5)

ORDER

Dated this the 05^th day of August, 2025 Petitioners are the accused in Crime No.90 of

2025 registered at the Edavanna Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1) and 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 , now pending as C.C.No.388 of 2025 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Manjeri.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the dispute, which led to the incident and registration of the crime, is amicably settled and Annexure A3 afÏdavit has been filed by the 2nd respondent vouching this fact.

3. Learned Counsel for the 2^nd respondent also submitted that the dispute is settled and his client has no grievance against the petitioners.

4. I heard the Learned Public Prosecutor also.

5. Having considered the gravity of the offences alleged and having perused the afÏdavit, the contents of which are vouched to be true and voluntary by the Counsel for the 2^nd respondent, I am satisfied that no public interest is involved in this matter and the dispute has been settled amicably. In vie

Click Here to Read the rest of this document