Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V. G. Arun, J
HAMZA M.K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the petitioner’s criminal background. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the implications of subsequent crime on existing bail. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court requirement for substantiation of allegations before bail cancellation. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. the necessity for thorough inquiries into allegations during bail proceedings. (Para 7) |
ORDER Petitioner is the 1st accused in Crime No.1044 of 2023 registered at the Kondotty Police Station for offences punishable under Section s 364 and 307 r/w Section 34 of IPC . Therein the petitioner was granted bail as per Annexure 2 order, subject to conditions. By condition No.3, the petitioner is restrained from threatening or influencing the material witnesses either directly or indirectly, so as to dissuade them from giving statements or evidence against him. Condition No.4 interdicts the petitioner from getting involved in any other offence while on bail. After one year of his enlargement on bail, the petitioner got implicated as an accused in Crime No.1440 of 2024 registered at the Kondotty Police Station for offences punishable under Sections
331(2), 126(2), 115(2), 74, 76 and 351 of BNS.
2. The crime was registered on the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
