Kerala HC Issues Notice to Digi Yatra Foundation in PIL Seeking Strict Compliance with DPDP Act 2023 for Airport Passenger Data: High Court of Kerala
07 Mar 2026
Appointment to Higher Post on Compassionate Grounds Not a Matter of Right: J&K&L High Court
07 Mar 2026
Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
CJI Kant: Action Needed for More Women Judges
10 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SOUDATH K.V – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2018 / 3RD MAGHA, 1939 WP(C).No. 10156 of 2016 PETITIONER(S):
SOUDATH K.V., HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (ARABIC), C.H.M.HIGH SCHOOL, ELAYAVOOR P.O., VARAM, KANNUR DISTRICT-670 621.
BY ADV.SRI.POOVAMULLE PARAMBIL ABDULKAREEM RESPONDENT(S):
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KANNUR.
4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KANNUR.
5. THE MANAGER, C.H.M.HIGH SCHOOL, ELAYAVOO
Teachers appointed against regular vacancies must receive approval regardless of when the appointment occurred within the academic year.
Approval of teacher appointments during ban periods is contingent upon the execution of required bonds by school management, and timely resolution of related petitions is essential.
Point of Law : In terms of Rule 8 of Chapter XIV-A KER, appointment of petitioner for said period should have been approved by Educational Officer within 30 days and had this statutory obligation bee....
The lack of communication regarding the protected teachers' list necessitates approval of qualified teachers' appointments without unjust delays.
The court affirmed deemed approval for teacher appointments due to the respondent's failure to act within legal timelines and ruled that objections for rejection were legally invalid.
The manager's discretion in teacher appointments is subject to established preference rights under the Kerala Education Rules.
The timely approval of teacher appointments is critical for educational administration.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article