Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.N.RAVINDRAN, DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, JJ
VATAKARA CO-OPERATIVE AYURVEDA HOSPITAL LTD NO.2787 – Appellant
Versus
PUTHALATH THAZHA KUNIYIL AYISHA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of tenants and background of eviction (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. legal arguments regarding eviction claims and representation (Para 2 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's analysis of claims and rebuttals (Para 3 , 7 , 8 , 12 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. insight into misjoinder of causes and court's reasoning (Para 16 , 22 , 28 , 29) |
| 5. final order and conditions for eviction (Para 34 , 36 , 38) |
Devan Ramachandran, J.
The tenants, who have suffered the discomfiture of two orders against them from the courts below, ordering their eviction from the petition schedule properties, have come up before us in this revision.
2. The contentions of the tenants/petitioners herein are foundationalised on certain very specific legal issues impelled along with the rather routine defences against claims of landlords for eviction on grounds of bonafide need.
3. We will deal with the contentions presently, after we place on record certain essential facts.
4. R.C.P.No.6 of 2014 on the files of the Rent Control Court, Vatakara, from which this revision arises, was filed by respondents 1 and 2 herein, who concededly are the owners of the petition schedule shoprooms. The said schedule consists of three i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
