IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MANOJ THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
CAN FIN HOMES LTD – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2018 / 22ND SRAVANA, 1940 1940 OP (DRT).No. 77 of 2018 AIR (SA) 68/2018 of DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI PETITIONER/S:
MANOJ THOMAS S/O.JP THOMAS,AGED 51,RESIDING AT DILSHANOJ,15,JAWAHAR NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695041.
BY ADV. SRI.K.C.ELDHO RESPONDENT/S:
CAN FIN HOMES LTD REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER,TC
28/2452,GROUND FLOOR,MG ROAD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
BY ADV. SRI.C.AJITH KUMAR THIS OP (DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13.08.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
-------------------------------------
O.P. (DRT) No.77 of 2018 --------------------------------------
Dated this the 13th day of August, 2018 Petitioner Manoj Thomas, a borrower, defaulted on repayment and, so, faced recovery proceedings. When the Respondent finance company issued a notice under Section 13 (4) of the SARFASI Act, Thomas filed S.A. No. 418 of 2013 before the Debt Recovery Tribunal–
II, Ernakulam.
2. When Thomas filed an amendment application before the Tribunal, it dismissed the petition through the Exhibit P4 order.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.