Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K.Harilal, Mrs. Annie John, JJ
RAVINDRAN P R. – Appellant
Versus
LAKSHMI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaint for partition of properties (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contention regarding will execution (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. lower court's dismissal and responses (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. evidence on will's execution (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. statutory requirements for will execution (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. proof of execution of will (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. attestation and execution of will (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 8. evidence and claims about will's execution (Para 26 , 27 , 30) |
| 9. question of existence of item no. 8 (Para 31) |
| 10. remittance for fresh adjudication (Para 32 , 33) |
JUDGMENT
Annie John, J.
The appellant herein is the plaintiff in O.S.No.260 of 2009 on the file of Additional Subordinate Judge's Court, Palakkad. The suit was filed for partition of the plaint schedule properties. The parties herein are the legal representatives of late Raman, who died on 08.12.2008. The appellant and respondent Nos.2 to 4 are the children of late Raman and the first respondent is his wife, who is the mother of the other parties herein.
2. The suit has been filed by the appellant for partition. The brief facts of the case are as follows:
According to the appellant, the plaint schedule propert
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
