SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 78847

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ROBIN LOOKOSE – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY,THE 07TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 16TH KARTHIKA, 1940 WP(C).No. 37244 of 2017 PETITIONER/S:

1 ROBIN LOOKOSE AGED 39 YEARS, S/O. P.A. LOOKOSE, PALACKIL HOUSE, KOZHIMALA P.O., IDUKKI - 685 511.

2 SOUMYA ANN VARGHESE AGED 35 YEARS, W/O. ROBIN LOOKOSE, -DO-

BY ADVS.

SRI.SHABU SREEDHARAN SMT.NIDHI RAVINDRAN SMT.RESHMA ABDUL RASHEED SRI.D.THILAKAN SRI.M.YOHANNAN SRI.P.R.VIBHU RESPONDENT/S:

1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM - 686 001.

2 THE SECRETARY PARATHODU PANCHAYATH, PARATHODE P.O., KOTTAYAM - 686 512.

BY ADVS.

SRI.BINNY THOMAS SRI.TITUS MANI SMT.RAJI.T.BHASKAR,GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON

07.11.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Petitioners are husband and wife who were purchased an extent of 8.40 ares of property as per Ext.P1 sale deed. They applied for building permit before the 2nd respondent along with required documents. Since the said property was described as 'Thottam' in the Ext.P3 possession certificate, the 2nd respondent issued Ext.P4 letter requiring the petitioners to produce a certificate fro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top