SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 79520

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
KHADIJA BEEVI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) 36758/2018



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN TUESDAY ,THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 22ND KARTHIKA, 1940 WP(C).No. 36758 of 2018 PETITIONER/S:

KHADIJA BEEVI, AGED 61 YEARS W/O.LATE MOIDEENKANNU, SHIBA MANZIL, VEGANOOR, VIZHINJAM, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -

695 121. BY ADVS.

SRI.V.G.ARUN (K/795/2004)

SMT.INDULEKHA JOSEPH SRI.NEERAJ NARAYAN RESPONDENT/S:

1 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2 MAINTANCE AND WELFARE OF SENIOR CITIZEN TRIBUNAL REPRESENTED BY THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

3 SHEMNA BEEGAM AGED 40 YEARS D/O KADEEJABEEGAM, BISMILLAMANZIL, VEGANOOR, VIZHINJAM, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-

695 121.

SMT.AMMINIKUTTY-SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

13.11.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who is a senior citizen aged 61 years, only seeks that her application namely Ext.P1 filed by her on 15.10.2018 before the 2nd respondent Revenue Divisional Officer, who is the competent Tribunal under the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen Act, he directed to be disposed of.

2. The learned senior Government Pleader says that the application of the petitioner was filed only on 15.10.2018 and therefore, that there is no justification in her rushing to the court in this manner. However, I notice that the 1st petitioner, being senior citizen, has a statutory right to have her application decided expeditiously and that any further delay may cause irreparable prejudice to her.

In the afore circumstances, I order this writ petition and direct the 2nd respondent to take up Ext.P1 and dispose it of in terms of law, after following the imperative procedural mandate under the Act, as expeditiously as possible but not later than two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

This Writ Petition is thus ordered.

Sd/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN Dxy JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED

15.10.2018 ON THE FILES MAINTANCE AND WELFARE OF SENIOR CITIZEN TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top