SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 80106

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SEETHAL JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
MARRIAGE OFFICER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 5TH AGRAHAYANA, 1940 WP(C).No. 30673 of 2018 PETITIONER/S:

SEETHAL JOSEPH,D/O LATE T.V. JOSEPH, THEKKEDATH HOUSE, PARAVATTANI, THRISSUR, NOW RESIDING IN APARTMENT NO.31130, EPPLEWORTH ROAD, SCARBOROUGH, TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA-MIK3G9. REP. BY POA, RAJESH JIBI, S/O P. THANKACHAN, AGED 44 YRS., KOTTAPURATH HOUSE, PERUNGALA P.O, KAYAMKULAM.

BY ADV. SMT.M.VANAJA RESPONDENT/S:

MARRIAGE OFFICER, KAYAMKULAM MUNICIPALITY, ALLEPPY DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.T.R.RAJAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.11.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved by the delay on the part of the respondent-Marriage Officer in taking steps for registration of her solemnised marriage, in terms of the provisions contained in the Registration of Marriages (Common) Rules (Kerala), 2008. The prayers in the above Writ Petition (Civil) are as follows:

“1. To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent to issue the Marriage Certificate.

2. Direct the respon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top