JUDGMENT

The petitioners are essentially aggrieved by the impugned Exts.P23 and P24 proceedings dated 25.09.2018 issued by the 2^nd respondent, whereby their applications for grant of transfer of registry and mutation of the properties have been rejected.

2. It is stated that the properties in question had originally belong to R6 (Namitha). R4 (Arunan) is the father of R6. The marital relationship between R4 (Arunan) and the mother of R6 was dissolved and thereafter R4 had married R5 (Renjini). The daughter- R6 had executed Ext.P1 power of attorney dated 16.06.2009 of SRO Njarackal in favour of her father R4, authorising him to look after the properties as well as for the sale of the said properties. On the strength of Ext.P1 power attorney, R4 had executed Ext.P2 registered sale deed dated 09.11.2010 conveying the said properties in favour of his second wife, R5. The relationship between the father and daughter (R4 and R6) got strained. It appears that R6 had executed Ext.P14 cancellation deed dated 08.11.2010 whereby Ext.P1 power of attorney dated 16.06.2009 was cancelled. Ext.P14 cancelled deed dated 08.11.2010 has been registered through the SRO, Ernakulam in the residence of R6.