Bail can be granted to accused in multiple cases if justification exists, particularly when the accused has been in custody for an extended period and is a woman, alongside conditions for bail to safeguard the investigation.

COMMON ORDER

These applications are filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, “ BNSS ”) seeking regular bail.

2. Since petitioner in all these bail applications is the same and as she is an accused in different crimes of a similar nature before various Police Stations, which are now pending investigation with the CBCID, Pathanamthitta, these applications are disposed of by this common order.

3. Petitioner along with other accused are alleged to have committed offences punishable under Section s 409 , 420, 120B r/w Section 3 4 of the Indian Penal Penal Code, 1860 apart from r/w Section 21 and Section 5 r/w Section 23 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 . B.A. Nos.9749, 9261, 9275, 9283, 9285, 9308, 9349, 9350, 9352, 9355, 9357, 9359, 9360, 9574, 9738, 9742, 9743, 9747, 9748, 9790, 9795, 9836, 9837, 9838, 9839, 9840, 9841, 9842, 9844 and 9845 of 2025, arises out of Crime Nos. 191/CB/KLM&PT, 277/CB/KLM&PT, 276/CB/KLM&PT, 275/CB/KLM&PT, 274/CB/KLM&PT, 240, 241, 246, 243, 248, 283, 282, 281, 168, 169, 170, 189/CB/KLM&PT, 180, 190/CB/KLM&PT, 162, 163, 181, 182, 183, 184, 202/CB/KLM&PT, 201/CB/KLM&PT, 200/CB/KLM&PT, 199/CB/KLM&PT and 198/CB/KLM&PT of 2024 respectively and petitioner is the second accused in all the above crimes except in BA Nos. 9749, 9574, 9738, 9742, 9743, 9748, 9790, 9795, 9840, 9841, 9842, 9844 and 9845 of 2025 where she is the third accused and in B.A Nos. 9747, 9836, 9837, 9838 and 9839 of 2025 where she is the 4^th accused. Petitioner was remanded to judicial custody on 27.03.2025, 07.07.2025, 09.07.2025, and 14.7.2025 respectively.

4. The defacto complainants are all depositors of M/s. G & G Financiers, which was earlier known as PRD Nidhi Limited. The prosecution case, which is almost identical in all cases, is that, the accused had with intent to make unlawful gain, conspired with each other and in furtherance of their common intention, collected deposits from the defacto complainants, by falsely promising to pay high rate of interest and thereafter failed to pay any interest and even refused to return the amounts deposited and thereby committed the above offences.

5. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutors.

6. Petitioner was arrested in some of the connected crimes as well and by orders in B.A. Nos.4576/2025, 5720/2025 and connected cases, this Court has already enlarged the petitioner on bail, considering that the petitioner is a woman and also considering the fact that she has actually been in judicial custody since 06.02.2025 onwards.

7. Since in similar and connected matters, petitioner has already been directed to be released on bail, and as no reasons are pointed out to avoid extending the benefit of bail in these applications as well, this Court is of the view that petitioner ought to be released on bail in these applications as well.

8. In the result, these applications are allowed by directing the petitioner to be released on bail in the above mentioned crimes on her executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) in each of the crimes, with two solvent sureties each for the like sum, to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court, subject to the following conditions:

(a) Petitioner shall appear before the Investigating OfÏcer as and when directed;

(b) Petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or procure to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any Police OfÏcer;

(c) Petitioner shall not commit any of