Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P, J
MUHAMMED NAVAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail application based on serious allegations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments against and for granting bail. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's reasoning balancing bail with investigation integrity. (Para 5) |
J U D G M E N T
This appeal has been filed under Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Atrocities Act'), challenging an order dated 08-08-2025 in Crl. M.P. No.961/2025 on the file of the Special Judge, Special Court for Trial of Offences under SC/ST (POA) Act, Mannarkkad, through which an application filed by the appellant for regular bail in connection with Crime No.688/2025 of Ottapalam Police Station, Palakkad was rejected by that court. Crime No.688/2025 of Ottapalam Police Station is one registered alleging commission of offences under Sections 126 (2), 115 (2), 117 (2), 351 (2), 140 (3) read with 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ( BNS ) along with Section 3 (2) (va) of the Atrocities Act, 1989.
2. The first appellant is the son-in-law of the 2nd appellant. The allegation is that at about 1.30 a.m. on 29-07-2025, the appellants contacted the de facto complainant through the w
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
