Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JJ
THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICES PALAKKAD DIVISION – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNADASAN A. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the original petition regarding macp. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. procedural aspects of the petition and tribunal's involvement. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. discussion of earlier judgments relevant to macp proceedings. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. critical interpretation of the macp criteria and justification for tribunal's decision. (Para 8 , 9) |
--
JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J.
This original petition is one filed by the respondents in O.A.No.136 of 2017 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench, which was one filed by the respondents herein-applicants, seeking an order directing the petitioners herein to extend them the benefit of Annexures A3 and A5 judgments by granting grade pay of Rs.4,200/- on being granted 2nd financial upgradation under Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACP Scheme). The applicants have also sought for an order directing the petitioners herein to grant 2nd financial upgradation under MACP Scheme and grant grade pay of Rs.4,200/- with effect from 01.03.1993 and 09.01.1993 respectively; a declaration that they are eligible for 2nd financial upgradation under MACP Scheme and placement in grade pay of Rs.4,200/- with effect from 01.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
