IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SHEEJA SUBAIR – Appellant
Versus
SUBAIR AP – Respondent
OP (FC) 655/2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN &
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.B. SNEHALATHA WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 / 8TH KARTHIKA, 1946 OP (FC) NO. 655 OF 2024 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16.10.2024 IN I.A.NO.12/2024 IN OP NO.1074 OF 2023 OF FAMILY COURT, TIRUR PETITIONER/PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
SHEEJA SUBAIR, AGED 47 YEARS, W/O SUBAIR, ADATTILPARAMBIL, CHIYYANUR, KOKKUR PO, AALANKODVILLAGE, NANNAMMUKKU, KOKKUR, MALAPPURAM, KERALA, PIN - 679585 BY ADVS.
RIZWANA A.A.
AQIB SOHAIL P.S.
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT S /RESPONDENT S :
1 SUBAIR A.P., AGED 53 YEARS, S/O SIDDIQ HAJI ADATTIPPARAMBIL HOUSE,KANJIYOOR, NANNAMMUKKU, KANJIYOOR, NANNAMMUKKU PO,, PIN - 679575
2 SAFIYA SIDDIQ, AGED 66 YEARS W/O SIDDIQ HAJI ADATTIPPARAMBIL HOUSE,KANJIYOOR, NANNAMMUKKU, KANJIYOOR, NANNAMMUKKU PO,, PIN - 679575
3 SALIM A.S, AGED 49 YEARS S/O SIDDIQ HAJI ADATTIPPARAMBIL HOUSE,KANJIYOOR, NANNAMMUKKU, KANJIYOOR, NANNAMMUKKU PO,, PIN - 679575
4 FATHIMA UMMER, AGED 44, W/O UMMAR A V, AMMACHUTTUVALAPPIL HOUSE VATTENAAD, KOOTTANAAD,, PIN - 679533
5 MISRIYASHIHAB, AGED 40, W/O SHIHAB, ADATTIPPARAMBIL HOUSE,KANJIYOOR, NANNAMMUKKU, KANJIYOOR, NANNAMMUKKU PO,, PIN - 679575 THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
30.10.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT Devan Ramachandran, J.
The petitioner has approached this Court with a singular plea that we stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order of the learned Family Court, Tirur, in I.A.No.12/2024, in O.P.No.1074/2023. The edifice on which such a plea is made – as has been impelled by Smt.Rizwana A.A., learned counsel for the petitioner – is that the afore order has not been yet issued to her.
2. We, therefore, called for a Report from the learned Family Court; and it has now informed us that the certified copy of the order in I.A.No.12/2024 in O.P.No.1074/2023 was issued on
16.10.2024.
3. Obviously, nothing remains for us to intervene at this stage because the petitioner will have to invoke her remedies against the said order.
In the afore circumstances, this Original Petition is closed.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE Sd/-
M.B. SNEHALATHA JUDGE RR APPENDIX OF OP (FC) 655/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORIGINAL PETITION IN OP 1074/2023 DATED 27.10.2023 Exhibit P2 THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE INTERIM APPLICATION FOR ATTACHMENT ALONG WITH SCHEDULE NUMBERED IA 2/2023 IN OP
1074/2023 DATED 27.10.2023 Exhibit P3 THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF INTERIM APPLICATION FILED FOR LIFTING THE ATTACHMENT NUMBERED IA 12/2024 Exhibit P4 THE TRUE COPY OF COUNTER IN IA 12/2024 Exhibit P5 THE TRUE COPY OF DOCUMENT LIST ALONG WITH VALUATION CERTIFICATE Exhibit P6 THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF INTERIM APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER SEEKING PERMISSION TO CROSS EXAMINE THE VALUATOR NUMBERED IA 18/2024 Exhibit P7 THE TRUE COPY OF COPY APPLICATION, ALONG WITH EMERGENT APPLICATION
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.