Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
MOHAMMED NISHAQ K.P. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accusations of inappropriate conduct by a trainer. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments for and against anticipatory bail. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's acknowledgment of the seriousness of allegations. (Para 7) |
| 4. discretion and standards for granting anticipatory bail. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. conditions for granting bail acknowledged. (Para 10) |
ORDER
This bail application is filed under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘ BNSS ’).
2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.664 of 2025 of Thenhipalam Police Station, Malappuram, registered for the offences punishable under Section 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 7 r/w Section 8 and Section 11 (iv) r/w Section 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 .
3. According to the prosecution, the accused, who is a trainer in weightlifting, had sent abusive messages to the victim onto her mobile phone and also on a day in November, 2025, caught hold of her hands with sexual intent and again in December, 2024, inserted his hand inside her dress and caressed her back and also collected money from her for travelling to Delhi and thereby committed the offences alleged.
4. H
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
