Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU, J
SAJEEVAN P N – Appellant
Versus
ESAF SMALL FINANCE BANK – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bank accounts can be frozen based on police instructions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the court outlines procedural directives involved in managing account freezes. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
J U D G M E N T
Petitioner approached this Court aggrieved by freezing of his account maintained with Chavakkad branch of the 1st respondent Bank. Notice was issued to the 2nd respondent and it was served on the said respondent. However there is no appearance for the 2nd respondent.
2. Learned Standing Counsel on instructions submitted that lien was marked for an amount of Rs.10,000/- on the basis of instructions received from Cyber police, Tamil Nadu.
3. Notice was issued to the 2nd respondent police authority by speed post and also by e-mail as provided under Rule 51(3) of the Rules of the High Court of Kerala, granting sufficient time to respond. However, there is no appearance for them. Therefore, I proceed to dispose of this writ petition by issuing directions incorporating sufficient conditions to protect the interest of the respondent police authority also to avoid delay in disposal of the writ petition.
4. Since there is no appearance for the 2nd respondent despite service of notice, I disp
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
