Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Murali Purushothaman, J
THE PLANTATION CORPORATION OF KERALA LTD. – Appellant
Versus
MR.ATHEESH MATHEW ADEYADI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiffs filed multiple suits regarding contract breaches. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's observations on the necessity for joint trials. (Para 3 , 4 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. arguments presented for and against joint trials. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's reasoning for allowing joint trials. (Para 9) |
| 5. final ruling mandates joint trials. (Para 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT
This original petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against Ext.P4 order dated 18.03.2014 in I.A No.2242 of 2013 in O.S No.635 of 2009 on the files of the Court of the Principal Sub Judge, Kottayam.
2. The petitioner, the Plantation Corporation of Kerala Ltd. is the plaintiff in O.S Nos.635 and 636 of 2009, O.S Nos.2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 42, 43 and 44 of 2010 on the files of the Court of the Principal Sub Judge, Kottayam. The respondents herein are the defendants in the said suits. The respondents placed bids in an auction for the right to slaughter tap the rubber trees standing in various divisions of various blocks of the plaintiff’s estate at Thannithode. The defendants were the successful bidders and 32 separate agr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
