Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
AFSAL NOUSHAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for bail based on allegations of assault. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. prosecution claims involvement of the accused. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. defense asserts absence of involvement and necessity for bail. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court considers conditions for bail. (Para 7) |
| 5. final ruling allowing bail with conditions. (Para 9) |
ORDER
This bail application is filed under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘ BNSS ’).
2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1767 of 2025 of Adoor Police Station, Pathanamthitta, registered for the offences punishable under Section 118 (1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 .
3. According to the prosecution, the accused had assaulted the defacto complainant on 01.08.2025 and thereby committed the offences alleged.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely arrayed as an accused and that he has no involvement in the alleged crime.
6. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and submitted that custodial interrogation is essential.
7. Considering the nature of allegation
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
