Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 47361

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
NIHAL.A – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 3904 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SUNEESH KUMAR R.
For the Respondents: SMT PUSHPALATHA M.K., SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The court emphasized procedural compliance under Rule 19(4) of the Kerala Criminal Rules of Practice as a basis for case closure.

Headnote:The judgment addresses the compliance of the prosecution with Rule 19(4) of the Kerala Criminal Rules of Practice regarding the furnishing of statements, documents, and material objects. It concludes that the criminal miscellaneous case can be closed as the purpose has been fulfilled. The court affirms that all procedural requirements have been met, leading to the closure of the case.

O R D E R

The petitioner has filed an affidavit stating that the prosecution has furnished the list specifying the statements, documents and material objects as required under Rule 19(4) of the Kerala Criminal Rules of Practice .

Hence the Crl.M.C. is closed as purpose fulfilled.

(Sd/-)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 47361

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMG. GIRISH, JNIHAL.A – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 3904 OF 2025

The court emphasized procedural compliance under Rule 19(4) of the Kerala Criminal Rules of Practice as a basis for case closure.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
NIHAL.A – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 3904 OF 2025