Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
AJITH ABRAHAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. basic facts of the alleged crime and the context. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments for and against the bail application hearing. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observation regarding evidence and necessity of intent. (Para 8 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. exploration of the legal basis for abetment of suicide. (Para 9 , 11) |
| 5. final ruling concerning the grant of bail. (Para 14) |
O R D E R
This bail application is filed under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short ‘ BNSS ’). 2. Petitioners are accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.312 of
2025 of Upputhara Police Station, Idukki, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1) and 108 r/w Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. According to the prosecution, on 10.04.2025, the de facto complainant’s nephew caused the death of his two children and committed suicide along with his wife and the accused are alleged to have instigated the deceased to commit suicide and thereby committed the offences alleged.
4. I have heard Smt.Sruthi Rajit, the learned Counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri.Prasanth M.P., the learned Public Prosecutor. I have also perused the case diary.
5. The learned Counsel su
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
