Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
BINSI, W/O SANDEEP CHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
SANDEEP CHANDRAN, S/O CHANDRAN NAIR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts and circumstances surrounding the appeal for maintenance. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. arguments from both sides concerning the necessity of medical examination. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 3. court's discussion on justification for medical examination in maintenance. (Para 3) |
| 4. deciding on the appropriateness of medical examinations in maintenance cases. (Para 6) |
| 5. conclusion and directives for case expeditious handling. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
JUDGMENT
This Original Petition has been led under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging Ext.P3 and P8 interim orders passed in M.C. No. 236 of 2020 on the les of the Family Court, Thalassery. The petitioners herein are the petitioners in M.C. No. 236 of 2020, and the respondent is also the same.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the orders impugned.
3. In this matter, the petitioners herein, who are the wife and minor child of the respondent, led application for maintenance before the Family Court, Thalassery. During pendency of the proceedings, the court referred the parties for counselling. Then the counsellor reported some symptoms of mental health to the petit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
