SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 91477

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
STHUTHI SURESH – Appellant
Versus
THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER – Respondent
WA 2094/2024



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR &

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.

WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2024 / 27TH AGRAHAYANA, 1946 WA NO. 2094 OF 2024 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.11.2024 IN WP(C) NO.38541 OF

2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANT/PETITIONER:

STHUTHI SURESH, AGED 28 YEARS D/O SURESH, PRATTECKKATHU HOUSE, THARAYILKADAVU MURI, VALIYAZHEECKAL, ARATTUPUZHA VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPALLY THALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 690516 BY ADV K.R.SUNIL RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

1 THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, NO.8, 2ND FLOOR, TRANSPORT TOWERS, VAZHTHACAUD, THYCAUD P. O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014

2 THE STATE TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, ROOM NO. 394, MAIN BLOCK, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIRSTRICT, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN - 695001

3 THE SUB REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, MOTOR VEHICLE DEPARTMENT, KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 690572

4 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY, 2ND FLOOR, CENTRE POINT, PATHNAPURAM ROAD, KAYAMKULAM,ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, PIN - 690572

5 V. SAKTHIVEL, INSURANCE SURVEYOR AND LOSS ASSESSOR, IIISLA LICENTIATE NO: L/S/10375, IRDA/IND/SLA. NO.

121571, PLOT NO. 30, LATHA FLATS, PHASE III, 2ND FLOOR, UDAYA NAGAR MAIN ROAD, PORUR, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, PIN - 600116 GP Resmitha Ramachandran THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.12.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

DR. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR &

EASWARAN S., JJ.

---------------------------------------------------------

WA No.2094 of 2024 ---------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of December, 2024

JUDGMENT

Dr. A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar , J .

After arguing the matter for sometime, the learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the writ appeal without prejudice to his right to approach the appropriate forum.

Permission is granted. The writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the afore requested liberty being granted to the appellant.

Sd/-

DR. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE Sd/-

EASWARAN S.

JUDGE ACR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top