SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 48758

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T. R. Ravi, J
LIJU M N – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SHERRY J. THOMAS, SRI.P.J.UNNIKRISHNAN, SRI.RENISH RAVEENDRAN, SRI.JOEMON ANTONY, SHRI.ANTONY NILTON REMELO, SHRI.LIGISH XAVIER, SMT.ANJANA P.V.
For the Respondents: SHRI.T.K.AJITHKUMAR, SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU, SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH, SRI.P.K.ABDUL RAHIMAN, SMT.ARYA RAGHUNATH, SHRI.KARUKAPADATH WAZIM BABU, SMT.P.LAKSHMI, SMT.AYSHA E.M., SHRI.HASHIM K.M., SHRI.ABUASIL A.K., SMT.HANIYA NAFIZA V.S., SHRI.MANU KRISHNA S.K., SHRI.M.I.INSAF MOOPPAN, SHRI.RISHI VINCENT, SMT.PRINCY XAVIER

JUDGMENT

The writ petition has been filed for a direction to restrain the 5th respondent from interfering with the affairs of Haritha Karma Sena. The petitioners are office bearers of consortium of Haritha Karma Sena in Cheranelloor Grama Panchayat. The 5th respondent has filed a counter affidavit wherein it is specifically stated that the 5th respondent is only doing the work entrusted by the Panchayat and she is not in charge of collection and fund management of Haritha Karma Sena from January, 2025, onwards.

In view of the above statement, the grievance of the petitioners cannot be said to be surviving any longer. The counter affidavit of the 5th respondent is recorded and this writ petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top