MlJU J AGRO vs SHEERA S - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 48803

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 48803

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Devan Ramachandran, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
MlJU J AGRO – Appellant
Versus
SHEERA S – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI . JOENSON GCREZ, SRI . SENJAY .OENSON, SHRI . JOIN COREZ, SHRI.ARtJN JOHNY, SMT.DEEBU R, SHRI . aelN ]AcoB RATHEw, SHRI . SENJITH JOENSON
For the Respondents: SRI.K.v.ANII, KumR, SMT.RADHIKZI S.Ailll, SHRI. NIJAZ 4A14REI

Table of Content
1. appeal against divorce decree (Para 1)
2. acceptance of lawful mediation agreement (Para 2 , 3)
3. compliance required for settlement terms (Para 4 , 5)

JUDGMENT

M.B.Snehalatha, J

This appeal has been preferred by the husband challenging the decree of divorce granted in OP(MMA). No.181/2023 of Family Court, Punalur.

2. During the pendeney of this appeal, matter has been settled between the parties and pursuant to the mediation, they have filed a memorandum of agreement under Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure r/w Rules 24 and 25 of the Civil Procedure (Mediation) Rules 2005. A copy of the settlement agreement filed by the parties in O.P (Others).No.768/2024 before Family Court, Punalur, dated 20.08.2025 has been produced before this Court.

3. We have examined the memorandum of agreement and we notice that it has been signed by the parties and subscribed by their counsel. The terms of the agreement are lawful and therefore the settlement arrived at by the parties is accepted.

4. In view of the settlement arrived at by the parties, Mat.A No.1082/2024 is allowed and the judgment and decree in OP(MMA).No.181/2023 of Family Court, Punalur stand set aside. It is recor