SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
SHABEENA.S. – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.NIDHEESH
For the Respondents: SRI. K.M. ANEESH

J U D G M E N T

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers;

“1. Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, calling for the records leading to Ext.P1 and quash the same as illegal.

2. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondent to keep in abeyance the SARFAESI proceedings vide Ext.P1 for a period of two weeks so as to enable the petitioner to challenge the SARFAESI proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

3. Grant such other Relief.”

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the notice by the Advocate Commissioner, threatening dispossession though dated 22.08.2025, was received later and seeks a short time to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the SARFAESI Act').

3. Taking note of the limited request made by the petitioner, two weeks' time from today is granted to the petitioner to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal challenging the actions of the respondent Bank. Needless to say that all coercive steps against the pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top