IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. Babu, J
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE EMPLOYEES' HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO. E. 933 – Appellant
Versus
THE JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), OFFICE OF THE CO-OPERATIVE JOINT REGISTRAR – Respondent
Writ Petition | Article 226
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims loan recovery from salaries. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner presented undisputed repayment agreement. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court orders salary deductions to fulfill repayment. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
The prayers in this Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are as follows:-
“(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or appropriate order or direction directing the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent to deduct a substantial amount from the salary of the respondents 4 and 5 and direct the 3" respondent to deduct requisite amount from the salary of the 6th respondent and further direct the respondents 2 and 3 to remit the deducted amount to the account of the petitioner by virtue of Section 37 of the Co-operative Societies Act .
(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or appropriate order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to deduct or recover a substantial amount from the salary of the respondents 4 and 5 and direct the 3rd respondent to recover the amount form the 6th respondent till clear o the due amount and direct the respondents 2 and 3 to remit the deducted amount to the account of the petitioner in view of Exhibit P1 to P7.
(iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or appropriate order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to deduct the balance due amount from the terminal benefits of the 4th respondent.
(iv) To dispense with filing of the translation of the vernacular documents.
(v) Grant such other orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit proper considering the facts and circumstances of the case and iv) Grant the costs of this writ Petition. ”
2. The petitioner extended a financial loan to respondent No.4. He committed default in repaying the amount due to the petitioner. It is submitted that a sum of Rs.12,00,000/- (Rupees Twelve Lakhs only) is due to the petitioner from respondent No.4.
3. Notice was served on the party respondents. They did not turn up.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner, relying on Exts. P9 and P10, submitted that respondent No.4 has agreed to deduct a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand only) from his monthly salary, and that the balance amount due to the petitioner shall be realised from his retirement benefits.
5. The assertions in the Writ Petition and the submissions are not refuted.
6. Having regard to the statements in Ext.P9 and the communication in Ext.P10 from respondent No.2, respondent No.2 shall deduct the salary and pensionary benefits of respondent No.4, as mentioned in Ext.P10, and remit the same to the petitioner's account.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.