SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 49622

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
, J
BIJUKUMAR D – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
C.C.No.1188 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents:

Amicable settlement between parties can warrant quashing of criminal proceedings under IPC and domestic violence laws to prevent unnecessary judicial process.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 498A - Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - Section 31(1) - In the present case, the petitioner faced prosecution under IPC and the Domestic Violence Act - The de facto complainant stated in an affidavit that the matter has been amicably settled, showing her non-interest in continuing the proceedings - The court recognized the private nature of the issue and emphasized the need to terminate the prosecution to prevent abuse of process and maintain harmony. (Paras 2-6)

(B) Quashing of Proceedings - The continuation of prosecution is not necessary as the dispute has been settled amicably, aligning with the intent to avoid unnecessary judicial proceedings based on private matters. (Paras 5-6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner faced charges under IPC and the DV Act but settled the matter with the complainant, leading to her request to quash the proceedings.

Findings of Court:
The court found that continuing prosecution would serve no purpose, hence quashing the case for harmony.

Issues: The primary legal question addressed was whether the amicable settlement warranted the quashing of the proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that since the private dispute was settled, prosecution should not continue, preventing court abuse.

Result: The petition stands allowed and the proceedings are quashed.

Table of Content
1. issues settled amicably are grounds for quashing. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments raised regarding prosecution. (Para 3)

ORDER

The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.1188 of 2024 on the files of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Nedumangad. He faces criminal prosecution for the commission of offences under Section 498A IPC and Section 31 (1) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act , 2005.

2. In the present petition, the petitioner would contend that the issue involved in this case, has been amicably settled with the de facto complainant, and hence the proceedings against the petitioner are liable to be quashed.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent and the learned Public Prosecutor representing the State of Kerala.

4. The de facto complainant has filed an affidavit before this Court, stating that the issue has been amicably settled with the petitioner, and hence she is not interested in continuing the proceedings against the petitioner.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor, upon instructions, submitted that the de facto complainant had given statement to the Investigating Officer also, to the effect that the issue has been amicably settled with the petitioner, and hence she is not interested in continuing the criminal prosecution against the petitioner.

6. The issue involved in this case is purely private in nature. Now that it has been amicably settled between the parties. Having regard to the above facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that no purpose would be fulfilled by the continuance of the prosecution against the petitioner, and hence it is highly necessary to terminate the prosecution proceedings to prevent abuse of process of court. Such a course is also required to maintain the harmonious relationship between the parties. Therefore, the prayer in this petition to quash the proceedings against the petitioner, has to be allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top