Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ELSAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SUBHASH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of the revision petition's basis. (Para 1) |
| 2. consideration of prior relinquishment agreements. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. final disposal with rights to reapply. (Para 4) |
ORDER
This revision petition is filed against the order dated
13.10.2020 in MC No.499/2019 of Family Court, Kannur, by which an application for maintenance is rejected mainly for the reason that the petitioner relinquished her right to get maintenance as per an agreement executed on 20.05.2019.
Aggrieved by the same, this revision petition is filed.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent.
3. Admittedly the petitioner relinquished her right to get maintenance as per Ext.B1 agreement in the year 2019. In the year 2019 itself, the petitioner filed an application to get maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The same cannot be accepted. It is true that simply because the wife relinquished the right to get maintenance and if there is any change of circumstances, she can very well file a fresh application for maintenance. But here is a case where in the year 2019 she relinquished her right to get maintenance and in the same year she filed an application under
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
