Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Devan Ramachandran, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
MISHAMOL M – Appellant
Versus
SANDEEP PAVITHRAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal details and background. (Para 1) |
| 2. settlements reached between parties. (Para 2) |
| 3. examination of settlement terms. (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 4. court's satisfaction of consent and irretrievable breakdown. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. granting of divorce by mutual consent. (Para 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT
M.B.Snehalatha, J Mat.A No.374/2025 is an appeal preferred by the wife from the judgment and decree of divorce granted in O.P( HMA )No.530/2016 of Family Court, Alappuzha filed by her husband under Section 13 (1) (i-a) and (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act.
2. Today, when this appeal came up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for both sides submitted that the entire disputes between the parties have been settled and a joint petition and memorandum of mediation settlement agreement have been filed before this Court.
3. We have examined the memorandum of agreement and we notice that it has been signed by the parties and subscribed by their counsel. The terms of the agreement are lawful and therefore, the settlement arrived at by the parties is accepted.
4. In view of the settlement arrived at by the parties, Mat.A No.374 of 2025 3 2025:KER:67724 appellant and respondent have filed a peti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
