Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
JAYASREE RAJKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
INSPECTOR OF POLICE CBI/SPE, COCHIN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. misappropriation of funds by public office holder. (Para 5 , 11 , 17) |
| 2. court's validation of prosecution through confession evidence. (Para 7 , 10 , 19) |
| 3. evidentiary standards in proving joint liability. (Para 8 , 9 , 18) |
| 4. modification of sentence based on appeal. (Para 20 , 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT
The sole accused in C.C.No.1 of 2004 on the files of the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, (SPE/CBI) II, Ernakulam, is the appellant herein and he assails judgment in the above case dated 25.07.2011. The respondent herein is the Inspector of Police, CBI/SPE, Cochin, represented by the Special Public Prosecutor for C.B.I.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant/accused as well as the learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI. Also heard the learned Standing Counsel representing for the 2nd additional respondent/defacto complainant in this case.
3. Perused the judgment under challenge as well as the records of the Special Court and the decisions placed by both sides.
4. I shall refer the parties in this appeal as `prosecution’ as well as `accused’ for easy reference.
5. In this case the prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under Sections 409 and 47
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
