SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 50094

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
K. MADHAVAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.A NO. 548 OF 2018|CRL.A NO. 552 OF 2018|CC NO.26 OF 2016|CC NO.25 OF 2016



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: C.DINESH
For the Respondents: A.RAJESH, REKHA S

A criminal appeal abates upon the appellant's death if heirs do not wish to proceed, allowing prosecution to pursue fine collection.

Headnote:The appeal arises under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment of conviction dated 03.04.2018 in C.C.Nos.25/2016 and 26/2016 by Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Kozhikode. The appellant, having died on 21.12.2018, and the legal heirs expressing no intent to proceed, the appeals were dismissed as abated. The prosecution retains the liberty to pursue fine realization from the appellant's assets. The court clarified legal options for any grievances of the heirs regarding the fine.

Table of Content
1. criminal appeal abates upon death of appellant if heirs do not proceed. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court permits prosecution to pursue fine realization. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 16th day of September, 2025 These criminal appeals have been filed under Section

374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973, challenging common judgment of conviction dated 03.04.2018 in C.C.Nos.25/2016 and 26/2016 on the files of the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Kozhikode. The appellant herein is the accused in both the above cases.

2. In this matter, the learned counsel for the appellant/accused would submit that the appellant died on 21.12.2018. A copy of the death certificate issued by the Registrar of Births and Deaths, Porur Grama Panchayat dated 06.04.2019 has been placed in support of the same. He also submitted that the legal heirs of the appellant are not intended to proceed with these appeals.

3. Since the legal heirs of the accused are not ready to come and proceed with these appeals, these appeals are dismissed as abated, with liberty to the prosecution to proceed with realisation of fine imposed as part of sentence from the assets, if any, left by the legal heirs of the appellant.

It is made clear that if the legal heirs of the appellant have any grievance in realisation of fine from the assets left by the accused, they are at liberty to opt appropriate legal proceedings.

Registry is directed to forward a copy of this judgment to the Special Court, for information and compliance.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top