Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, P. Krishna Kumar, JJ
PRASANTH KUMAR N.G. – Appellant
Versus
VIDYA V. NAIR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for return of gold ornaments based on alleged misappropriation. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. evidence supports the wife's claim against the husband's denial. (Para 4 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. modification of earlier decree aligns with the findings of misappropriation. (Para 5 , 8) |
P.Krishna Kumar, J.
The husband and his relatives challenge the decree passed by the Family Court, Kottayam, in favour of the wife for the return of 39 ½ sovereigns of gold ornaments and certain other movable articles, along with Rs.20,000/-. 2. The marriage was solemnised on 27.10.2011. The wife contended that, at the time of her marriage, she was given 36 ½ sovereigns of gold ornaments as her family share. Additionally, 3 sovereigns of gold ornaments were gifted to the first appellant by the respondent’s parents. It is her case that soon after the marriage, she went to Mali for employment and, at that time, entrusted her gold ornaments to the first appellant in trust. The respondent alleges that the entire ornaments were misappropriated by the appellants. She therefore sought recovery of the gold ornaments and other articles entrusted to them at the time of marriage, together with reimbursement of the amount
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
