SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 68866

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Devan Ramachandran, M.B.SNEHALATHA, JJ
R. Murukan – Appellant
Versus
Murukan R & Others – Respondent
Mat.Appeal No. 604 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri. P. S. Binu, Smt. K. Seera
For the Respondents: Adv. E.D. George

The court affirmed the validity of mediation settlements, emphasizing that such agreements, when lawful and properly executed, are to be accepted and enforced.

Headnote:(A) Mediation and Settlement - Terms and legality of agreement - The parties reached a lawful mediation settlement which was duly signed and accepted by both sides. The appeal has been disposed of in terms of the mediated settlement. (Paras 1-5)

(B) Court’s role in mediation - The court verifies the legality of the settlement agreement prior to acceptance. (Para 2)

Facts of the case:
The appeal arose from a dispute settled amicably through mediation at the Mediation Centre, Ernakulam, with the terms involving a monetary settlement.

Findings of Court:
The terms of settlement are lawful and thus the settlement is accepted by the court.

Issues: The main issue was whether the settlements reached through mediation are lawful and binding.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for verifiable lawful terms in mediation settlements and acknowledged them in appeal proceedings.

Result: Mat.A No.604/2024 is disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at by the parties.

Table of Content
1. the parties have reached a mediation settlement. (Para 1 , 2)
2. the court verifies the legality of the mediation settlement. (Para 3)
3. the case is disposed of based on the settlement agreement. (Para 5)

MAT.A NO. 604 0F 2024 2025 : KER: 684 90 DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN & M.B.SNEHALATHA, JJ.

11-1,,11-I---------I--11-I-,11-Ill--11-I-I, Mat.Appeal No.604 of 2024 --11--111---------I---I--,,I--I-----I-11--I Dated, this the 15th September, 2025 JUDGMENT M.B.Snehalatha, J Today, when this appeal came up for hearing before us, the learned counsel appearing for both sides submitted that the entire dispute between the parties have been settled in the mediation held under the aegis of Mediation Centre, Ernakulam and a memorandum of mediation settlement agreement has been entered into by the parties and their counsels.

2. We have examined the memorandum of mediation settlement agreement and we notice that it has been signed by the parties and subscribed by their counsel. The terms of the agreement are lawful and therefore the settlement arrived at by the parties is accepted.

3. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, Mat.A No.604/2024 is disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at by the parties.

MAT.A NO. 604 0F 2024 2025 : KER: 68490

5. The parties are directed to act implicitly in terms of the memorandum of settlement agreement and shall comply all the terms therein, which do form part of this I.udgment.

Sd/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, JUDGE Sd/-

M.B.SNEHALATHA JUDGE ab To C=wh SO ?:r+ . .®

`hem iof, Gap. L.all •.* • '. ., ., . . . ` ..-.. I. I.... : .......

I.... ` ...•. ` . - . ..

. `. _ .... '.- ` -`.' , -

EkdeKLiLrd ri-.EbinT.ich. cErmE .

•.,...-..... ` .....-..

•... '. ..{plgiv a®ImT.nALL}.. .

`t. .

Froin..: `,..` .... :I. . '

.............

•`..

-`.......Ep¥#ifeal.ari..I.`..

I to ..

• .i . .

HgbRffiisREitin:

. , 'o ,, sub:.q•q,ui.ftydrcin'rin dyin.Hch:b!6.H!ghqoLirt.ofKpela-

:-. a ro,'.-. I.-.,,:

•,.,.

Rot ;.J RGfomal.

.Ofpe..PchgivbleHkyh`qqurfofNeFala

1` ap. to. famard hereirm firio* Pi gr® Met.I.dear in. tn± mgiv gldrg •wht.ffie.rfeisiires'drirferri.utgivr- fu-. n©®, r,y.acuari. . . ` . . ' .

•.` .......... `i ...-. :. • . i .` .t.,utrs Enolly..

.-. in!u##ffion certre Of .the ftyha.

1. ± g#.##:ffi, giv dgiv .fix eEFonE THE iion'BLE HIGli cOuRT OF icefIALA AFT ERNAicuLAM Mat AbBeal N®.604 Of 2024 R Muruken : Appellant Vs, Murulcan R & Cmers : Reapndents Mediated. Settled.

Terms Of settlement are attached herewith.

Dated tlils the 22,ttt day of Atigust, 2025.

fro Adv. E D George Mediator High Court Medlat!on C-entre \....

BEFORE "E HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KEfIALA AT Ef`NAKULAM Mat ADB®al Ilo.604 Of 2024 R Murukan : Appellant Vs.

Murukan R a Oners : Reapndents Both parties entered into an agreement of settlement in the above mentloned case in the followlng tens:-

1. Respondents I to 8 agreed to pay Rs.4,50,OOO/- (Rupees Four lakhs fifty thousand only) to the appellant towards full and final settlement of the above case.

Appellant Resp®nd®nts I to a R.Murukan giv lfMuftykanR dip+-

2. Kuppamma dr

3. Panchali

4. Dhasan M

5.KrishnanK tr

6.Santhi #

7. sandeep .£ife$

8.Sanjay #

•2-

2. The above said amount will be given to the appellant on or before

13/02#026.

3. In tlie event of any default in`-the payment Of the said amount, the appellant is entitled to proceed with matter before the appropriate forum wlth 12% inteilest on Rs.4,50,000/- (Rupees Four lakhs fifty thousand only) from the date of default.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top