SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 50814

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
K.HASSAINAR SHARJID – Appellant
Versus
A. SHAMNA – Respondent
RPFC NO. 336 OF 2018 | MC NO.215 OF 2914



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.ASAFALI, SMT.LALIZA.T.Y
For the Respondents: SHRI.K.P.SUDHEER, SRI.K.M.FIROZ, SMT.M.SHAJNA

Maintenance rights persist under Section 125 Cr.P.C until benefits under the Muslim Women Act are received.

Headnote:(A) Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, Section 3 - Cr.P.C., Section 125 - Maintenance - The Family Court granted maintenance to the respondents which the petitioner challenged. The court found that maintenance under Section 125 continues until the amounts under Section 3 are paid. (Para 4)

(B) Rights of Children - It was noted that children are entitled to maintenance until they reach majority unless they have physical disabilities. (Para 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the quantum of maintenance awarded to a divorced woman and her children by the Family Court, asserting different financial circumstances. The case remains pending regarding benefits under the Muslim Women Act.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the Family Court's decision on maintenance without interferences since the rights under Section 125 Cr.P.C remain until amounts under Section 3 are actually received.

Issues: The main concern concerned the continuation of maintenance in light of a pending claim under the Muslim Women Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that maintenance rights persist under Section 125 Cr.P.C until benefits from the Muslim Women Act are received, confirming entitlement until children reach majority barring disabilities.

Result: Revision petition disposed of.

Table of Content
1. maintenance rights persist despite ongoing claims. (Para 1 , 4)
2. legal counsel arguments regarding right to maintenance. (Para 2 , 3)
3. conclusion on awards and rights of claimants. (Para 5)

ORDER

This revision is filed against the order dated 23.05.2019 in MC No.215/2014 on the files of the Family Court, Tirur. As per the impugned order, the Family Court granted maintenance to the respondents @ Rs.15,000/-, Rs.10,000/- and Rs.5,000/-

respectively. Aggrieved by the same, this revision is filed.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the respondents.

3. When this revision came up for consideration, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the 1st respondent is a divorced woman and she has already filed a petition under Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce)

Act, as evident by Annexure-A2.

4. The counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that even now the case is pending and till orders are passed and the amount due is received, the respondents are entitled to get maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. I think, there is a force in the argument of the respondents. If a petition is filed by the 1st respondent for claiming benefits under Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act , the right of the respondents to get maintenance under Cr.P.C will continue till the amount due as per of the Muslim Women (Protection of Right on Divorce) Act are actually paid. (See paragraph No.34 of Mohd.Abdul Samad v. State of Telangana [ 2024 KHC 6356] )

5. The marriage and paternity of the respondents are not disputed in this case. A perusal of paragraphs 36 and 37 of the impugned order would show the capacity of the petitioner. I see no reason to interfere with the quantum of maintenance awarded by the family court. But, I make it clear that, if an order under Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act is passed and the 1st respondent received the amount, the petitioner need not pay maintenance to the 1st respondent. As far as the children are concerned, they are entitled maintenance only till they attain majority on condition that they have no other physical disabilities.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top