Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
K.HASSAINAR SHARJID – Appellant
Versus
A. SHAMNA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. maintenance rights persist despite ongoing claims. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. legal counsel arguments regarding right to maintenance. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. conclusion on awards and rights of claimants. (Para 5) |
ORDER
This revision is filed against the order dated 23.05.2019 in MC No.215/2014 on the files of the Family Court, Tirur. As per the impugned order, the Family Court granted maintenance to the respondents @ Rs.15,000/-, Rs.10,000/- and Rs.5,000/-
respectively. Aggrieved by the same, this revision is filed.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the respondents.
3. When this revision came up for consideration, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the 1st respondent is a divorced woman and she has already filed a petition under Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce)
Act, as evident by Annexure-A2.
4. The counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that even now the case is pending and till orders are passed and the amount due is received, the respondents are entitled to get maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. I think, there is a force in the argument of the respondents. If a petition is filed by the 1st
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
