Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
RADHAKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
ANITHA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court reviews the family court's maintenance order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's health condition vs. obligation to provide maintenance. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. review of relevant case law supporting maintenance rights. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. summary of court's rationale on maintenance obligations. (Para 8) |
| 5. final decision dismissing the revision petition. (Para 9) |
ORDER
This revision is filed against the order dated 05.11.2022 in MC 425/2018 on the files of the Family Court, Thrissur. As per the impugned order, the Family Court granted maintenance to the 1st respondent @ Rs. 6,000/- and the 1st respondent is also allowed to recover an amount of Rs. 5,000/- per month towards the expenses incurred for maintaining the 2nd respondent with e 04.08.2018 till the date of demise of the 2nd respondent, i.e., on
19.08.2021. Aggrieved by the same, this revision is filed.
2. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the respondents.
3. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is suffering from epilepsy and is not in a position to earn money. The counsel for the respondents submitted that the Family Court considered all the contentions of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
