SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 43042

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
MOHAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 35492 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.O.D.SIVADAS, SMT.DEVIKA R.
For the Respondents: SRI. AKHIL SURESH, SMT. SURYA BINOY

The court emphasizes the necessity for timely consideration of permit applications under transport law.

Headnote:This judgment addresses a writ petition concerning the renewal of a stage carriage permit under the provisions of relevant transport laws. The petitioner seeks prompt action on applications pending before the Regional Transport Authority, which the court directs to consider without delay. The court emphasizes adherence to legal timelines in processing permit requests. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for permit renewal. (Para 1)
2. court's direction for timely consideration. (Para 2)

J U D G M E N T

This writ petition is filed with the following prayers;

“ i. Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction to the Regional Transport Authority to grant renewal of regular permit in respect of stage carriage bearing No. KL 08/BC 9595 on the route Thrissur – Kozhikode as LSOS untrammeled by the scheme published vide SRO No. 537/2023 by the Government and further direct the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority to issue the permit as Limited Stop Ordinary Service.

ii. Issue appropriate writ, order or direction to the Secretary Regional Transport Authority to consider Ext.P5 application for temporary permit in respect of stage carriage bearing No. KL 08/BC 9595 on the route Thrissur – Kozhikode as LSOS and grant and issue the same as LSOS untrammeled by the scheme published vide SRO No. 537/2023 by the Government iii. Grant the petitioner such other reliefs which this Hon’ble court deem just and fit in the circumstance of the case.”

2. Taking note of the fact that the petitioner’s application for renewal of the regular permit is pending consideration before the 3rd respondent, there will be a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider the same in accordance with law, and pass appropriate orders on the same, at the earliest, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. Ext.P5 application has been preferred by the petitioner seeking a temporary permit is pending consideration before the 4th respondent, which shall be considered within three weeks in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top