SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 43268

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ANGELIEN M.R – Appellant
Versus
RAJEEV – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN, SHRI.WINSTON K.V, SMT.ANU JACOB, SMT.KEERTHY RAJ
For the Respondents: SRI.ABDUL RAOOF PALLIPATH, SRI.PRAJIT RATNAKARAN

O R D E R

When this Revision Petition (Family Court) and Crl. Appeal came up for consideration, the counsel appearing for the parties submitted that the disputes between the parties are already settled and hence they are not pressing these cases.

Therefore, this Revision Petition (Family Court)

and Crl. Appeal are dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top