Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
NIYAS S/O.MUHAMMAD ALI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused convicted for robbery based on victim's testimony. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court hearings and prosecution arguments presented. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. insufficient evidence leads to reasonable doubt regarding guilt. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. revision petition results in acquittal of the accused. (Para 10 , 11) |
O R D E R
(Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2025)
The challenge in this revision petition is the conviction and sentence rendered against the revision petitioner under Section 392 of IPC .
2. The revision petitioner is the sole accused in CC No. 914/2011 on the files of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Chavakkad. He stood trial before that Court for committing an offence punishable under Section 392 IPC .
3. The prosecution case is that, on 24.07.2010 at about 10 a.m, while PW1 was walking through Thiruvathra- Pattalam road and when she reached in front of the house of one M.Madhavan, the accused came in a motor cycle bearing Reg.No.KL-10 U 8252 and snatched a gold chain worn by her, weighing 4 ½ sovereigns, after causing hurt to her.
4. The trial court on an appreciation of the evidence on record and hearing both sides, found the accused guilty under Section 3
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
